alleged that, if returned to Iraq, he would be at real risk of persecution and possibly death. Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), A.A.M. They further found that, although the applicant was at risk of persecution by al-Qaeda in Mosul where there was a strong al-Qaeda presence, he could relocate to another part of Iraq. His request was examined by the Migration Board and Migration Court and ultimately rejected in 2011 on the ground that the authenticity of the arrest warrant and judgment were questionable. He also claimed that he was at risk of persecution by al-Qaeda for having voiced unacceptable religious opinions. In support of his claim, he provided copies of the arrest warrant against him and the judgment convicting him. He submitted in particular to the Swedish authorities that he was wrongly convicted in Iraq in his absence and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment for aiding terrorists. He then entered Sweden and claimed asylum in November 2008. He claims that shortly afterwards his shop was destroyed by a bomb. He alleges that in August 2008 he fled Mosul where he owned a shop when an Iraqi branch of al-Qaeda threatened him for refusing to dismiss a young woman in his employment who did not wear a veil. Your deck can be reviewed at any point between its submission and the deadline.The applicant, A.A.M., is an Iraqi national and is originally from Mosul (Iraq).
#Cedh database update#
You can see the next submission deadline, as well as estimated update dates, on our Discord server. In comparison to other decks in these colours this deck struggles in the card advantage department, but it excels in metas with lots of combo decks because of its ability to quickly go for a win then swap to a controlling game plan. If that fails, it deploys Rule of Law effects to prevent other combo decks from playing a fast game and beats people down with its commanders. No more than 600 characters (to prevent scrolling).Įxample: This deck tries to go for an Underworld Breach combo as soon as possible, preferably at turn two or three.Explain the deck’s weaknesses, preferably by comparing it to other options.Explain the deck’s strengths, preferably by comparing it to other options.Explain the main game plan and backup plan, preferably in relation to game turns.Known approved websites are: Aetherhub, Archidekt, Deckbox, Deckstats, Moxfield. Preferably, the website has an easy compare and/or revision history function.Isn’t on the DDB Blacklist (This record is currently only held by TappedOut).Does not require an account or additional steps to view lists, including custom filters and views that aren’t easily overwritten.Needs to display ‘Last updated’ information.If a list historically saw play, you can submit it directly to the Outdated section. Preferably no overreliance on the commander.The ability to consistently interact with your opponents, or win the game, around turn three.A commander that isn’t easily replaced by a stronger alternative.No inclusions that don’t enhance the deck’s gameplan in some way.Inclusion of all relevant staple cards for the strategy.A strategy that has an expected winrate of around 25% in a competitive environment.The list must be commander legal ‘out of the box’ (Spoiled cards are fine, but only if they will release before or right after the update).
The decklist requirements are displayed to give you an idea of what types of decks we're looking for. Lists that do not follow the requirements set in the ‘Website’ and ‘Description’ sections will not be reviewed.
0 kommentar(er)
